中国式智能投顾:规制路径与方案选择

钟维

中国人民大学学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (3) : 122-131.

PDF(9061 KB)
主管:教育部
主办:中国人民大学
ISSN 1000-5420  CN 11-1476/C
PDF(9061 KB)
中国人民大学学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (3) : 122-131.
法学

中国式智能投顾:规制路径与方案选择

作者信息 +

RoboAdvisers in China: Regulation Approach and Scheme Selection

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

在金融科技创新领域,法律制度的生命力在于对金融创新实践的承认、共识和规范化,而非以既有的制度来格式化市场和实践对新型交易模式的需求。智能投顾规制的主要问题在于全权委托型智能投顾,不管是将其纳入投资顾问业务,还是纳入资产管理业务进行规制,都是可选择的路径。如果选择将其纳入投资顾问业务,那么需要资本市场高层级立法的支持。如果选择将其纳入资产管理业务,那么必须采用全权委托账户管理的规范方案,而不能采用信托型资产管理规范方案。四部委《关于规范金融机构资产管理业务的指导意见》中对智能投顾的规制逻辑是不清晰且令人费解的,应当予以修改和完善。

Abstract

In the field of fintech innovation,the vitality of legal system lies in the recognition,consensus and normalization of financial innovation practice,rather than formatting the need of market and practice for new pattern of transaction with existing systemThe problem of regulation over roboadvisers mainly focus on the discretionary account form of itIt is optional to include it in either investment advice or assets managementIf it is chosen to be part of the investment advisory business,it needs the support of capital market highlevel legislationIf it is chosen to be included in the asset management business,the scheme of discretionary account management must be adopted,rather than the fiduciary assets management schemeThe regulation logic for roboadvisers in the new asset management rules is unclear and confusing,which should be revised and improved

关键词

智能投顾 / 人工智能 / 投资咨询 / 资产管理 / 资管新规

Key words

RoboAdvisers / Artificial intelligence / Investment advice / Assets management / New asset management rules

引用本文

导出引用
钟维. 中国式智能投顾:规制路径与方案选择[J]. 中国人民大学学报, 2020, 34(3): 122-131
ZHONG Wei. RoboAdvisers in China: Regulation Approach and Scheme Selection[J]. Journal of Renmin University of China, 2020, 34(3): 122-131
PDF(9061 KB)

1365

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/