起源于国际标准组织的FRAND规则具有一定的特殊性，但我国合同法、专利法及反垄断法对FRAND规则引发的诉讼具有普适性，能够为FRAND规则的适用提供依据及指引。我国法院在审理涉及FRAND规则的纠纷时，在某些方面恰恰忽视了这一点。法院应从FRAND承诺的要约邀请属性出发，判断专利持有者、标准实施者是否尽到了善意磋商义务，进而判定标准实施者在侵权成立时是否应承担停止侵害责任，以形成和我国现有法律适用标准相契合的FRAND适用规则。

The FRAND rule for standard essential patent which originates from the international standard organization has certain particularity. The general rules of the contract law, patent law and antimonopoly law of China are applicable in litigations arising from this rule and are capable of providing the basis and guidance for the application thereof. The court should examine whether the patent holder and the standard implementer have fulfilled the obligation of bona fide consultation according to the invitation attribute of the FRAND promise made by the holder, and then decide whether the standard implementer should bear the liability of ceasing and desisting from the infringement while the infringement is established, so as to form an applicable rule of FRAND which conforms to the existing applicable standards of laws in China.