摘要
政治的运行有着两种截然相反的逻辑:一种是现实主义逻辑,它驱使权力主体去做政治上正确的事;另一种是规范主义逻辑,它要求权力主体去做道德上正确的事。现代政治理论用正当性统一了上述两种逻辑,一个正当的政体必须既要做政治上正确的事,也要做道德上正确的事,而保护弱者就是最基础的道德上正确的事。在权力主体与权力客体间的复杂博弈中,保护弱者逐渐衍化为一种道德上不正确的“政治正确”,而随着各种反“政治正确”运动的兴起,现代政治的正当性受到了普遍质疑。要重建正当性,当代政治必须致力于消除社会范围内的权力不平等。
Abstract
There are two different kinds of logics of political operationOne is called realism, which drives those in power to do the right things in the political senseThe other is called normativism, which requires those in power to do the right things in the moral senseModern political theory united these two with the concept of legitimacyNot only does a legitimate regime need to do the right things in the political sense, but it also needs to do things in a morally right wayProtecting underprivileged groups is the most basic case of things which are both politically right and morally rightHowever, it was gradually described as some kind of “political correctness” which is, in fact, morally incorrect during the complicated games between those in power and those without powerWith the rise of movements against “political correctness”, modern politics is in a serious legitimacy crisisTo rebuild its legitimacy, modern politics must be committed to eliminating inequality in power within the scope of the society
关键词
政治正确 /
道德正确 /
正当性 /
权力 /
规范政治理论
{{custom_keyword}} /
Key words
political correctness /
moral correctness /
legitimacy /
power /
normative political theory
{{custom_keyword}} /
张乾友,黄雨阳.
解析反“政治正确”运动的规范含义[J]. 中国人民大学学报, 2018, 32(3): 115-122
ZHANG Qianyou,HUANG Yuyang.
Exploring the Normative Implications of Anti“Political Correctness” Movement#br#[J]. Journal of Renmin University of China, 2018, 32(3): 115-122
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
{{custom_fnGroup.title_cn}}
脚注
{{custom_fn.content}}
基金
教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“社会治理的伦理重构”(16JJD720015);江苏省社会科学基金项目“以公平正义为导向的治理权力配置研究”(17ZZC001)
{{custom_fund}}