对安德森“类型学”权力思想的
几点思考

乔瑞金, 李瑞艳

中国人民大学学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (6) : 64-71.

PDF(1089 KB)
主管:教育部
主办:中国人民大学
ISSN 1000-5420  CN 11-1476/C
PDF(1089 KB)
中国人民大学学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (6) : 64-71.
政治学

对安德森“类型学”权力思想的
几点思考

  •  乔瑞金, 李瑞艳
作者信息 +

Study on Anderson's Typological Power Theory

  •  QIAO  Rui-Jin, LI  Rui-Yan
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

安德森在对西方社会历史与现实的研究中,逐步形成了一种基于唯物史观的“具体的类型学”的权力阐释模式,并在这一模式下分析了英国独特的“三角地形学”的权力结构模式。安德森在有关西方资产阶级权力结构的说明中,揭示出葛兰西“领导权”理论中所存在的矛盾和问题,并提出了自己的整体主义的解释,即经济是基础,文化是主导,政治是决定性因素。这一“类型学”的权力思想既蕴含着一种深层的结构主义思想和意识,也在具体的历史与现实中超越了结构主义,从而使对权力的解释回到了历史唯物主义的思想中。

Abstract

This paper is to discuss Andersons power structure thoughtFrom the study of history and reality in the western society, Anderson put forward a “concrete typological” power mode of explanation based on the historical materialism, and according to the explanation mode, he analyzed the “triangular topography” model of the British power structureMeanwhile, in the explanation of the bourgeois power structure in the west, Anderson revealed the contradictions which contained in Gramscis hegemonic theory, and then gave his holistic theory, which is economy is the fundament, culture is dominant, and politics is decisiveWe have to say, the “typological” power theory contains a deep structuralism consciousness and thought, its also a concretely historical and realistic combination; therefore, it transcends structuralism and towards the historical materialism explanation

关键词

权力 / 类型学 / 领导权 / 结构主义

Key words

power  / typology  / hegemony  / structuralism

引用本文

导出引用
乔瑞金, 李瑞艳. 对安德森“类型学”权力思想的
几点思考[J]. 中国人民大学学报, 2012, 26(6): 64-71
QIAO Rui-Jin, LI Rui-Yan. Study on Anderson's Typological Power Theory[J]. Journal of Renmin University of China, 2012, 26(6): 64-71
PDF(1089 KB)

4418

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/